The Globalist · A long read

The Globalist Thinker Type

A complete guide to cosmopolitanism, the identity that takes the whole world as home, and the most boundary-crossing mind in moral life.

A Globalist is someone whose primary identity and loyalty is to humanity as a whole, rather than to any single nation or group. Where others draw the circle of us around a particular people, the Globalist draws it around everyone, and sees the world as one interdependent community whose great problems can only be met together. To the Globalist, borders are real but, in the deepest moral sense, somewhat arbitrary, and home is the whole world.

What is a Globalist?

Ask a person where their we begins and ends, and the answer reveals a great deal. Most people draw it around something particular: a family, a community, a nation. The Globalist draws it around all of humanity, and means it.

The Globalist thinker type, one of the eighteen archetypes mapped by the Kwokka quiz, identifies first with humanity as a whole rather than with any one nation or group. This outlook has an old and respectable name, cosmopolitanism, the idea of being a citizen of the world. The Globalist sees humanity as a single interdependent community whose largest problems are shared and require cooperation across borders. They value openness, the crossing of boundaries, exchange between cultures, and shared institutions, and they regard national and group lines as, morally speaking, somewhat arbitrary. The Globalist feels at home in the world, not merely in one corner of it.

The Roots of Cosmopolitanism

The globalist outlook, properly called cosmopolitanism, is one of the oldest ideals in moral philosophy.

The original citizen of the world: When the ancient philosopher Diogenes the Cynic was asked where he was from, he is said to have answered that he was a citizen of the world. The Stoics developed the thought into a full vision of a single human community, a cosmopolis bound by shared reason.
Kant and the cosmopolitan order: Immanuel Kant gave cosmopolitanism a political form. In his essay on perpetual peace, he envisioned a peaceful, law-governed international order, a federation of free states, and argued for what he called cosmopolitan right.
Modern rooted cosmopolitanism: Contemporary thinkers have refined the ideal. A humane modern cosmopolitanism combines genuine obligations to all human beings with real respect for cultural difference, and describes the possibility of being, at once, a citizen of the world and rooted in a particular home.

Citizen of the World

The phrase at the centre of the Globalist's outlook is citizen of the world, and it is worth taking seriously rather than as a slogan. To be a citizen of a place is to belong to it, to share in its fortunes, and to owe it something. The Globalist claims that kind of belonging, and that kind of obligation, toward humanity as a whole.

This rests on two convictions. The first is moral: that a stranger on the far side of the planet has the same fundamental worth, and the same basic claim on our concern, as a neighbour, and that the accident of which side of a border a person was born on does not change what they are owed. The second is practical: that humanity genuinely shares one fate. The largest problems of the age, climate, pandemics, the global economy, the risks of catastrophic conflict, do not respect borders, and cannot be solved by any nation alone. They are common problems, and the Globalist concludes that they require common institutions and cooperation across boundaries.

It is worth being clear what the ideal does and does not say, because the word is often used loosely. Thoughtful cosmopolitanism does not call for the abolition of nations or local communities, and it does not despise particular attachments. Its most careful versions describe a rooted cosmopolitan: a person who is genuinely at home somewhere in particular and also holds, as their widest loyalty, a real allegiance to humanity entire. The Globalist thinker is the one for whom that widest loyalty is primary, and for whom the whole interdependent world is, in the end, the true community.

How To Tell If You're a Globalist

Read these sideways and notice which ones produce a quiet yes.

When you think about us, your instinct is to draw the circle around all of humanity rather than around one nation or group.
You feel that national and group borders are, in the moral sense, somewhat arbitrary lines.
You believe the great problems, climate, pandemics, the global economy, are shared, and can only be solved by cooperation across borders.
You are energised rather than threatened by other cultures, by exchange, and by the crossing of boundaries.
You feel at home in the world broadly, more than in one particular corner of it.
You think a stranger on the other side of the planet has the same fundamental claim on moral concern as a neighbour.
You value shared international rules and institutions, and you believe humanity needs more cooperation, not less.
You are uneasy with loyalties that ask you to put your own group's interest above the good of humanity as a whole.

If three or more of those landed, you carry a strong Globalist component, whatever the full quiz returns.

The Strengths of the Globalist Mind

The Globalist's gifts are the gifts of a mind whose horizon is the whole world.

A wide moral horizon.: The Globalist's concern is not bounded by a border. They take seriously the worth and the claims of people they will never meet, anywhere on earth.
A grasp of interdependence.: The Globalist genuinely understands that humanity shares one fate, and can think at the planetary scale that the largest problems actually require.
Openness.: The Globalist meets other cultures with curiosity rather than fear, and moves across boundaries with an ease that makes them a natural builder of connection.
Resistance to factionalism.: Because the Globalist's loyalty is to humanity, they are a standing check on narrow factionalism and on the worst of in-group hostility.
A builder of cooperation.: The Globalist works to connect rather than to wall off, and that instinct is exactly what the shared, cross-border problems of the age demand.

The Shadow Side: When Globalism Goes Wrong

The Globalist's shadow is the price of an identity that belongs everywhere and so, perhaps, nowhere.

Rootlessness.: An identity drawn around all of humanity can end up attached to no particular place at all, and a person genuinely needs some particular belonging, somewhere to be from.
Thinning the particular bonds.: The Globalist can undervalue the thick, local, particular ties, family, place, community, that people actually live by, and can mistake those bonds for parochialism when they are, in fact, a real good.
Abstract love.: A love of humanity in general can be weaker, and less reliable, than the particular love a person feels for their own, and the Globalist has to be honest about that gap.
The accountability problem.: Global institutions can be remote from, and unaccountable to, the local communities they affect, and a Globalist who ignores this can defend arrangements that real people experience as distant and imposed.
Heard as an indifferent elite.: To those deeply rooted in a place, the Globalist's mobility and wide identity can look like the outlook of a detached elite, indifferent to local life, and dismissing that perception rather than answering it is a genuine failure.

Cosmopolitanism in Thought

The globalist outlook's clearest figures are the philosophers of world citizenship across more than two thousand years.

Diogenes the Cynic: is the originating example. His reply that he was a citizen of the world gave cosmopolitanism its founding phrase and its enduring image.
The Stoics: are the example of cosmopolitanism as a system. Their vision of a single human community bound by shared reason turned the citizen-of-the-world idea into a developed moral philosophy.
Immanuel Kant: is the example of cosmopolitanism made political. His proposal for a peaceful, law-governed international order set out how the cosmopolitan ideal might be built into the relations between states.
Modern rooted cosmopolitanism: is the example of the ideal refined. Contemporary cosmopolitan thinkers have shown how a global loyalty can be combined with respect for cultural difference and with genuine roots in a particular home.

In culture, the globalist spirit belongs to the figure of the world citizen and the bridge-builder: the traveller who is at ease everywhere, the person whose imagination and sympathy are not stopped at any border.

Globalist Careers and Working Life

Globalist instincts are at home in international organisations, in diplomacy, in global development and humanitarian work, in international law, and in global health, climate, and other transnational policy, all fields whose work is cooperation across borders.

The type also does well in journalism with an international beat, in multinational and cross-cultural work, and in translation and exchange, anywhere the job is to connect people, institutions, and ideas across boundaries.

Worst-fit work is the role built on advancing one nation's or one group's interest against others, and, at the other extreme, the deeply local, place-bound work that a restless Globalist may quietly find too narrow.

A note specific to the type: the Globalist's work is strongest when the wide horizon is paired with a real attentiveness to the local and the particular. The most effective cosmopolitans take seriously the communities and the rooted lives that global decisions affect, rather than thinking only at the planetary scale.

Globalist Relationships

The Globalist brings openness, curiosity, and breadth to a relationship. They are at ease in the wider world and welcome its variety, they meet a partner's differences and a partner's background with genuine interest, and they bring an outward-looking, generous warmth to a shared life.

The friction point is that the same breadth can leave a partner wanting more rootedness. A relationship is, in its nature, a particular and partial bond, a small and specific us, and a Globalist whose identity is attached to everywhere can be experienced, by the person closest to them, as not quite fully attached here.

There is also the restlessness. The Globalist can be mobile and hard to anchor, drawn always toward the wider world, and a partner may long for a settled, particular home in a way the Globalist has to learn to value.

The person who will love a Globalist well shares their openness to the world, and can also be, for them, the particular and rooted here that gives a global identity a home, showing the Globalist that a deep, partial, local love is not a betrayal of their wide ideals but the ground that makes them livable.

Common Misconceptions About Globalists

Globalism, here, means cosmopolitanism.: It refers to an ancient and serious philosophical tradition of world citizenship, running from Diogenes and the Stoics through Kant, not to any conspiracy theory or political slur.
Globalism is not the claim that nations should not exist.: Most cosmopolitans value cultural difference and local community. The claim is about where a person's widest loyalty sits, with humanity, not that particular nations and places should be abolished.
Globalism is not the project of a detached elite.: The cosmopolitan tradition is a genuine ethical position with a two-thousand-year pedigree. It can be held by anyone, and its serious versions take rootedness and local life seriously.
Cosmopolitanism is not the same as having no attachments.: Thoughtful cosmopolitans describe a rooted cosmopolitan: a person with a global horizon and real, particular roots. A wide loyalty and a local home are not held to be incompatible.
Globalism is not just economic globalisation.: It is a broader stance about identity, loyalty, and the moral community, of which views about trade and the global economy are only one part.

Globalist vs Other Thinker Types

The Globalist is defined, above all, by the argument over how wide a person's we should be.

Globalist vs Tribalist.: The defining opposition. The Tribalist draws the circle of us around a particular group and owes it the deepest loyalty. The Globalist draws it around all of humanity. They give opposite answers to the most basic social question: who, really, are our own?
Globalist vs Communitarian.: A real disagreement about belonging. The Communitarian holds that identity and meaning are rooted in a particular community with its particular traditions. The Globalist holds that the widest and truest community is humanity itself.
Globalist vs Universalist.: Close kin, with an important distinction. The Universalist holds that moral principles apply equally to all people everywhere. The Globalist holds that one's identity, loyalty, and community are themselves global. A person can be a universalist about principles while still feeling rooted in one nation. The Globalist locates belonging itself at the global scale.
Globalist vs Burkean.: A contrast of horizon. The Burkean's loyalty is to inherited, particular institutions and the partnership of a specific people's generations. The Globalist's horizon is the whole interdependent world, and they pull in different directions on rootedness and scope.

Frequently asked questions

What is cosmopolitanism?

Cosmopolitanism is the moral and political outlook that one's primary identity and loyalty belong to humanity as a whole rather than to any particular nation or group. Captured in the phrase citizen of the world, it runs from Diogenes and the Stoics through Kant to modern thinkers, and holds that all human beings share one moral community.

Does being a globalist mean rejecting your own country?

Not in the considered versions of the outlook. Thoughtful cosmopolitanism does not call for abolishing nations or despising local communities. It holds that one's widest loyalty is to humanity, while leaving room for genuine attachment to a particular country and home. Many cosmopolitans describe themselves as rooted: global in horizon and local in belonging.

What is the difference between a globalist and a universalist?

A universalist holds that moral principles apply equally to all people everywhere. A globalist holds, further, that one's own identity, loyalty, and sense of community are themselves global. A person can be a universalist about moral principles while still feeling rooted in one nation. The globalist locates belonging itself at the scale of humanity as a whole.

What is the main criticism of globalism?

The central criticism is that an identity drawn around all of humanity can become rootless, and can undervalue the thick, particular bonds of family, place, and community that people actually live by. Critics also raise the accountability problem: that global institutions can be remote from the local communities they affect. Thoughtful cosmopolitans try to answer these by combining a global horizon with genuine local roots.

If this page described where you already draw the circle of us…

…the Kwokka quiz will tell you whether Globalist is your dominant type or one strong thread among several. It takes about ten minutes, and it doesn't ask for your email, your data, or your money.

Take the Kwokka quiz

Eighteen thinker types. Forty questions. One mirror.